M. Tinazzi et al., AMPLITUDE CHANGES OF TIBIAL NERVE CORTICAL SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS WHEN THE IPSILATERAL OR CONTRALATERAL EAR IS USED AS REFERENCE, Journal of clinical neurophysiology, 14(3), 1997, pp. 217-225
We performed topographical mapping of somatosensory evoked potentials
(SEPs) to the posterior tibial nerve using earlobe references both ips
ilateral and contralateral to the stimulation side. The voltage of the
frontal contralateral N37 and P50 components was enhanced, while the
voltage of the parietal ipsilateral P37 and N50 components was reduced
when the contralateral earlobe was substituted by the ipsilateral ear
lobe reference. Maps of the same data documented concomitant changes i
n negative and positive potential fields, showing an expansion of the
pre-Rolandic N37 toward the centrotemporal contralateral regions, and
a tendency of the parietal ipsilateral P37, N50 components to be more
focally distributed at the vertex. SEPs recorded at each earlobe (Cv6
reference) provided an explanation of these results: The contralateral
earlobe detected a negative potential corresponding to the N37 potent
ial recorded over the scalp, followed by a P50 potential that attenuat
ed the contralateral responses and enhanced the ipsilateral ones. The
ipsilateral earlobe had no significant effects on scalp SEPs, since it
detected only a large N33 negativity. Current source density (CSD) ma
ps were, of course, not influenced by the ear used as reference. Our r
esults suggest that the ipsilateral ear reference is better than the c
ontralateral one for recording ''genuine'' cortical SEPs. Therefore, i
t can be recommended in the clinical domain for mapping studies of low
er-limb cortical SEPs.