CERTAINTY OF PATERNITY AND PATERNAL EFFORT IN THE COLLARED FLYCATCHER

Citation
Bc. Sheldon et al., CERTAINTY OF PATERNITY AND PATERNAL EFFORT IN THE COLLARED FLYCATCHER, Behavioral ecology, 8(4), 1997, pp. 421-428
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Behavioral Sciences",Zoology,Ecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10452249
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
421 - 428
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-2249(1997)8:4<421:COPAPE>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Models of optimal parental investment predict that variation in certai nty of paternity can affect the optimal level of paternal investment w hen a male's expected paternity in different nesting attempts is not f ixed throughout his lifetime. Several attempts to test this prediction experimentally in monogamous birds have failed to induce a reduction in care by males. This may be because the method used, detaining males , is a poor model for what happens when a male's certainty of paternit y is naturally reduced. We caught and detained female collared flycatc hers Ficedula albicollis for 1 h immediately after laying on one or tw o occasions in an attempt to induce variation in certainty of paternit y for the males they were mated to. By capturing females immediately a fter laying we hoped to exploit the existence of an ''insemination win dow'' since males should be very sensitive to female absence during th is period. The general effect of the experimental manipulation was con sistent with reduced certainty of paternity: males responded by reduci ng their level of paternal care to nestlings, and males mated to femal es that had been caught on one morning fed nestlings significantly les s often and made a smaller share of feeding visits than males mated to control females. The effects of the experiment were generally weak, h owever, and we argue that certainty of paternity may be fixed well bef ore egg laying, in which case experimental manipulations are unlikely to have large effects. It is difficult to predict the effects of natur al variation in certainty of paternity on levels of male paternal care because differential allocation by females mated to attractive males may act in the opposite direction.