Effects of angiotensin II and the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan on the renal excretion of urodilatin

Citation
M. Heringlake et al., Effects of angiotensin II and the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan on the renal excretion of urodilatin, KIDNEY BL P, 24(2), 2001, pp. 79-83
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH
ISSN journal
14204096 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
79 - 83
Database
ISI
SICI code
1420-4096(2001)24:2<79:EOAIAT>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: The precise mechanisms regulating the natriuretic peptide urodi latin (ANP-95-126) remain to be defined, Renal excretion of urodilatin (UUR OV) has been shown to be modified by variations in plasma sodium and renal perfusion pressure. This suggests a relationship between urodilatin and the renin-angiotensin system, Methods: We investigated the effects of angioten sin II (All, 0.1 nmol/l) and the AT(1) receptor antagonist losar-tan (LS, 1 mu mol/l) on UUROV and renal function in isolated rat kidneys perfused for 180 min in a closed circuit system. A further series employing a vasoconst ricting concentration of endothelin-l (ET-1, 0.01 nmol/l) was performed to explore the effects of vasoconstriction and glomerular filtration rate (GFR ) on UUROV. Results: Urine flow (UV) and urinary sodium excretion (UN,V) de creased and renal vascular resistance (PVP) increased after treatment with All (n = 5) in comparison with a control group (n = 6; p < 0.05). Treatment with LS (0 = 5) and All+LS (0 = 5) had no significant effect on these para meters. GFR decreased after All (p < 0.05) and was not significantly altere d by other interventions. UUROV decreased after All (p < 0.05) and was comp arable to the control group after LS and All+LS. ET-1 (n = 5) induced a sig nificant increase in RVR and decreased UV and UN,V (p ( 0.05). Point-to-poi nt analysis revealed that the ET-1-induced vasoconstriction and the subsequ ent decrease in GFR had no effect on UUROV Conclusions: This suggests that vasoconstrictory concentrations of All decrease UUROV in the isolated perfu sed rat kidney. The lack of effect of ET-1 on UUROV suggests that the All-i nduced alterations in urodilatin excretion cannot be explained by vasoconst riction per se, Copyright (C) 2001 S.Karger AG, Basel.