Influence of honey bee (Apis mellifera) on kiwifruit pollination and fruitquality under Australian conditions

Citation
D. Howpage et al., Influence of honey bee (Apis mellifera) on kiwifruit pollination and fruitquality under Australian conditions, NZ J CROP H, 29(1), 2001, pp. 51-59
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CROP AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
01140671 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
51 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
0114-0671(200103)29:1<51:IOHB(M>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The influence of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) pollination of kiwifruit (Ac tinidia deliciosa (A.Chev.) C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson) under different po llination regimes (viz. honey bee supplementation, honey bee saturation in a cage with a single male cultivar, and honey bee exclusion) was investigat ed under Australian conditions during 1993/94 and 1995/96 seasons. Vines th at had no access to honey bees had significantly (P less than or equal to0. 01) lower fruit set (24%) compared to honey bee supplementation (91%) and b ee saturation (89%). The mean yield (kg/vine) and the mean number of fruit/ vine in bee-supplemented and bee-saturated treatments did not differ signif icantly, although vines that were excluded from honey bees produced signifi cantly (P less than or equal to0.01) lower yields. However, individual frui t weight in the bee-saturated treatments was affected. There were significa ntly more small fruit in bee-saturated vines than in vines that were supple mentary pollinated by honey bees. Bee activity as assessed by the number of bee visits on flowers (bees/vine per min) was significantly higher on male vines than female vines during the first 2 weeks of the flowering period. Honey bees were the main contributor to pollination and fruit set, although low numbers of other potential insect pollinators such as ladybird beetles and hover flies were also observed. The mean seed numbers in comparable fr uit from higher weight groupings (i.e., 70-89, 90-109, and greater than or equal to 110 g) in bee-supplemented and bee-saturated vines did not differ significantly, suggesting adequate pollination and fertilisation of ovules in these two treatments. Vines that were caged with a single male cultivar produced fruit with significantly higher (P less than or equal to0.01) tota l soluble solids concentration than did those that were honey bee supplemen ted. Possible reasons for the reduced mean fruit weight under honey bee sat uration are discussed.