Ho. Ahmed et al., High-frequency (10-18 kHz) hearing thresholds: reliability, and effects ofage and occupational noise exposure, OCCUP MED-O, 51(4), 2001, pp. 245-258
The objective was to investigate the reliability and effects of age and noi
se on high-frequency hearing thresholds. A cross-sectional study was used i
nvolving 187 exposed and 52 non-industrial noise-exposed subjects selected
randomly from noise-exposed and non-industrial noise-exposed subjects, resp
ectively. Each subject was tested with both conventional-frequency (0.25-8
kHz) and high-frequency (10-18 kHz) audiometry. Test-retest results showed
that high-frequency audiometry (HFA) was as reliable as the conventional pr
ocedure. Although the inter-subject variation was large, the intra-subject
variation was small, indicating that HFA can be used more reliably than the
conventional procedure to monitor individual cases over time. Both the hea
ring threshold at high frequencies and the upper frequency limit deteriorat
ed as a function of age and frequency. The exposed subjects had significant
ly higher hearing thresholds than the non-exposed subjects at all the high
frequencies tested, the difference between the two groups being greatest at
14 kHz. Multivariate analysis indicated that age was the primary predictor
and noise exposure the secondary predictor of hearing thresholds in a high
frequency range (10-18 kHz). In contrast, multivariate analysis indicated
the reverse order-noise exposure as the primary predictor, then age-for a c
onventional frequency range (0.25-8 kHz). The results of this study suggest
that HFA might be used as an early indicator for noise-induced hearing los
s and acoustic trauma rather than audiometry at a conventional frequency (4
kHz), particularly for younger groups.