Background. Severe forms of uveitis can often only be managed sufficiently
with systemic immunosuppression. All available drugs are known for their re
lative high rate of side-effects. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosup
pressant successfully used in management after organ transplantation and ma
ny autoimmune diseases, has shown remarkably less side-effects when used fo
r various forms of uveitis in monotherapy or in combination with corticoste
roids. The aim of this multicenter-study was to investigate if monotherapy
with MMF is effective in Various forms of uveitis.
Method and patients. Ten patients with anterior uveitis (n=3), intermediate
uveitis (n=2), panuveitis (n=4) and retinal vasculitis (n=1) were treated
in a prospective study with 2x1 g MMF daily. Previous immunosuppression had
been discontinued because of side-effects or ineffectivity in all patients
. In these patients MMF was given in addition to the other immunosuppressan
t at the beginning of treatment.
Results. The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 12 months (mean 4.5 months). U
nder therapy with MMF (monotherapy in 4 patients, additional prednisolone i
n 5 patients and additional metotrexate in 1 patient)8 patients remained fr
ee of recurrences. In one female patient depression of inflammation activit
y was only achieved after cessation of therapy with Cyclosporin A in combin
ation with MMF and a switch to methotrexate. Another patient with a bilater
al uveitis was free of recurrences in only one eye,the second eye did not d
evelop recurrence due to the additional corticosteroid treatment. Side-effe
cts were diarrhoea in one patient and probably gastrointestinal problems in
another (leading to cessation of therapy in both patients) and in another
case nausea,vomitus and alopecia 10 months after beginning therapy
Conclusions. MMF as a new immunosuppressant stopped inflammation or drastic
ally reduced the rate of recurrences in 8 oat of 10 patients with uveitis w
hich was previously not brought under control by other immunosuppressants.
The side-effects were tolerable in comparison with other immunosuppressive
agents. More patients, longer follow-up times and a comparative study with
Cyclosporin A are required to assess the long-term therapeutical success.