The relative density-to-shear velocity scaling in the uppermost mantle

Citation
F. Deschamps et al., The relative density-to-shear velocity scaling in the uppermost mantle, PHYS E PLAN, 124(3-4), 2001, pp. 193-211
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
ISSN journal
00319201 → ACNP
Volume
124
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
193 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9201(200108)124:3-4<193:TRDVSI>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
We perform inversions of gravity data (geopotential model EGM96) and seismi c tomography model (SlBRLBM) for the scaling factor (zeta), which relates r elative density anomalies to relative S-wave velocity anomalies. The gravit y data and tomographic model are anti-correlated below continents down to a depth of z = 200 km. This anti-correlation is not present below oceans. Ex cept for smoothness, which is controlled by a damping factor, no a priori i nformation is added to the inversion. Data are filtered between degrees l = 11 and l = 16 of the spherical harmonic expansion. This spectral window is well suited for the study of intermediate-size (2000-4000 km) anomalies in the uppermost mantle. Calculations are made separately for sub-continental and sub-oceanic mantle. The sub-continental and sub-oceanic scaling factor s are significantly different at depths shallower than 260 km. In both case s, the magnitude of zeta is around 0.05. The sub-continental scaling factor has a positive root down to,z = 220 km, whereas the sub-oceanic scaling fa ctor yields positive values down to z = 140 km only. At depth shallower tha n 350 km, models of zeta do not depend on the damping factor or the viscosi ty model. At depths greater than 350 km, the resolution of zeta (z) decreas es significantly and low degrees (l = 2-1) add information from large-scale anomalies and from the lower mantle. As a result, the shape and values of zeta for l = 2-16 and l = 11-16 are significantly different at depths great er than 350 km. A possible explanation of the discrepancies between the sub -continental and sub-oceanic scaling factor is that intermediate-scale anom alies are more important in the continental uppermost mantle than in the oc eanic uppermost mantle. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.