Effect of dichlorophenolindophenol, dichlorophenolindophenol-sulfonate, and cytochrome c on redox capacity and simultaneous net H+/K+ fluxes in aeroponically grown seedling roots of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): new evidence for a plasma membrane CN--resistant redox chain
I. Garrido et al., Effect of dichlorophenolindophenol, dichlorophenolindophenol-sulfonate, and cytochrome c on redox capacity and simultaneous net H+/K+ fluxes in aeroponically grown seedling roots of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): new evidence for a plasma membrane CN--resistant redox chain, PROTOPLASMA, 217(1-3), 2001, pp. 56-64
Excised roots from axenically grown sunflower seedlings reduced or oxidized
exogenously added 2,6-dichrorophenolindophenol (DCIP), DCIP-sulfonate (DCI
P-S), and cytochrome c, and affected simultaneous H+/K+ net fluxes. Experim
ents were performed with nonpretreated "living" and CN--pretreated "poisone
d" roots (control and CN--roots). CN--roots showed no H+/K+ net flux activi
ty but still affected the redox state of the compounds tested. The hydropho
bic electron acceptor DCIP decreased the rate of H+ efflux in control roots
with extension of the maximum rate and optimal pH ranges, then the total n
et H+ efflux (integralH(+)) equalled that of the roots without DCIP. The si
multaneously measured K+ influx rate was first inhibited, then inverted int
o efflux, and finally influx recovered to low rates. This effect could not
be due to uptake of the negatively charged DCIP, but due to the lower H+ af
flux and the transmembrane electron efflux caused by DCIP,which would depol
arize the membrane and open outward K+ channels. The different H+ efflux ki
netics characteristics, together with the small but significant DCIP reduct
ion by CN--roots were taken as evidence that an alternative CN--resistant r
edox chain in the plasma membrane was involved in DCIP reduction. The hydro
philic electron acceptor DCIP-S enhanced both H+ and K+ flux rates by contr
ol roots. DCIP-S was not reduced, but slightly oxidized by control roots, a
fter a lag, while CN--roots did not significantly oxidize or reduce DCIP-S.
Perhaps the hydrophobic DCIP could have access to and drain electrons from
an intermediate carrier deep inside the membrane, to which the hydrophilic
DCIP-S could not penetrate. Also cytochrome c enhanced integralH(+) and in
tegralK(+), consistent with the involvement of the CN--resistant redox chai
n. Control roots did not reduce but oxidize cytochrome c after a 15 min lag
, and CN--roots doubled the rate of cytochrome c oxidation without any lag.
NADH in the medium spontaneously reduced cytochrome c, but control or CN--
roots oxidized cytochrome c, despite of the presence of NADH. Ln this case
CN--roots were less efficient, while control roots doubled the rate of cyto
chrome c oxidation by CN--roots, after a 10 min lag in which cytochrome c w
as reduced at the same rate as the medium plus NADH did. CN--roots seemed t
o have a fully activated CN resistant branch. The described effects on K+ f
lux were consistent with the current hypothesis that redox compounds change
d the electric membrane potential (de- or hyperpolarization), which induces
the opening of voltage-gated in- or outward K+ channels.