PURPOSE: To assess the consequences of lossy compression on the diagnostic
accuracy of CT colonography for detecting colonic polyps.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT images of cleansed colonic segments were
evaluated. Source images were compressed to 1:1, 10:1, and 20:1 ratios with
lossy wavelet compression. Two independent readers blinded to correspondin
g colonoscopic results analyzed 144 randomly ordered colonic segments in mu
ltiplanar and volume-rendered endoscopic views. Sensitivity, specificity, a
nd receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each compres
sion ratio on the basis of expressed confidence in lesion presence. Similar
analyses were performed to assess distention and bowel preparation adequac
y and evaluation time required.
RESULTS: Results based on video colonoscopy- confirmed lesions revealed 100
% (four of four) sensitivity for lesions larger than 10 mm for compression
ratios 1:1, 10:7, and 20:1 for both readers; sensitivities for all lesions
smaller than 10 mm were 50%-78%, 38%-67%, and 38%-67% for respective ratios
for both readers. Differences in diagnostic performance for each reader ac
ross ratios were not significant (P = .30-.99, McNemar test). The time requ
ired to evaluate and assess bower preparation and distention adequacy did n
ot change significantly across ratios,
CONCLUSION: On the basis of the patient sample, lossy compression of transv
erse source images to at least a 20:1 ratio did not adversely affect diagno
stic performance or evaluation time for CT colonography.