A central proposition of the transaction costs literature is that firms wil
l substitute more complicated contractual arrangements for simple spot arra
ngements when transactions involve relationship-specific investments, I inv
estigate this proposition by testing whether simple spot arrangements are l
ess common when local trucking markets are thin., I find that doubling the
thickness of the market increases the likelihood that simple spot arrangeme
nts govern transactions by about 30% for long hauls. I find weaker evidence
of relationships between local market thickness and contractual form for s
hort hauls-hauls for which quasi-rents are particularly small. Contracts pr
otect quasi-rents over a surprisingly large range, but they play a less imp
ortant role as quasi-rents decrease.