Bears are difficult to radiomark for long-term studies because of juvenile
growth rates, dramatic seasonal weight changes, and similar head and neck g
irths for adults. Because collars may be discarded if mounted too loosely o
r cause neck ulcerations ii mounted too tightly, we compared use of collar
and implant radiotransmitters for black bears (Ursus americanus) at 3 locat
ions in Washington during 1994-1999. We marked 22 females and 38 males with
collar transmitters and 30 females and 40 males with implant transmitters.
Marking bears with collars or implants and collecting morphological data a
nd specimens required 20-55 minutes. Amount of Telazol(TM) used to anesthet
ize bears marked with collars and to conduct implant surgery and amount of
drug used between fall and spring captures differed significantly Amount of
drug did not differ between genders or for bears captured by helicopter or
snares. Bears lost collars with cotton breakaway spacers after approximate
ly 21 (+/-3.4, SE) months in the study area where mean annual precipitation
was 52 cm, and 10 (+/-2.5) months where mean annual precipitation was 200
cm. For bears marked with collars, detection rates (number of radiotelemetr
y relocations/aerial monitoring session) were similar for males and females
and among study areas. In contrast, we detected implant-marked males at le
sser rates than females and detected bears at different rates among study a
reas. Decreased signal strength for implant transmitters resulted in fewer
locations and greater search effort for males because they used larger spat
ial areas and were more difficult to relocate than females. Differences in
numbers of relocations obtained for male and female black bears marked with
implant transmitters may affect precision of spatial and habitat use estim
ates and gender comparisons of resource use and mortality rates. For these
reasons, implant transmitters may be adequate to monitor animals with small
home ranges but may not be appropriate to monitor wide-ranging animals.