The Thrombelastograph(R) (TEG(R), Haemoscope Corp., Skokie, IL) coagulation
analyzer is an effective point-of-care monitor for routine clinical practi
ce and clinical research. Prior investigators have used either arterial or
venous samples of blood for TEG(R) measurements. We conducted this prospect
ive cohort study to determine potential differences in TEG(R) variables bet
ween arterial and venous blood samples. Arterial and venous samples were dr
awn from 40 cardiac surgical patients, yielding 134 pairs for comparison. T
wenty-nine comparisons (control) were between arterial and arterial samples
and were not significantly different. For the arterial and venous comparis
ons (n = 105), mean (+/- SD) arterial and venous values were the following:
reaction time, 10 +/- 2 mm. vs 13 +/- 4 mm, P = 0.004; maximum amplitude,
59 +/- 9 mm vs 49 +/- 12 mm, P < 0.001; <alpha> angle, 61 +/- 10 degrees vs
51 +/- 14 degrees, P < 0.001; K, 5 +/- 2 mm vs 8 +/- 4 mm, P = 0.007; and
lysis, 2.5 +/- 1.7 vs 2.5 +/- 2.0 (not significant), arterial versus venous
, respectively. Arterial blood samples demonstrated TEG(R) values reflectin
g stronger (larger maximum amplitude) and faster (shorter reaction time and
K value, wider a angle) clot formation. The results suggest that users of
TEG(R) coagulation analyzers should be consistent with the site of blood sa
mpling given the potential differences obtained.