Two independent definitions for quantifying measurement accuracy and two li
miting schemes for their assessment are examined in this paper. Gauss' mean
square error MSE is compared to the symmetric-range accuracy A, describing
the range of measurements about a measurand. Both measures of accuracy acc
ount for systematic error (bias) and imprecision so as to quantify the clos
eness of estimates to the actual values being measured. Remarkably, it is f
ound that the accuracy functions are closely equivalent for most method app
lications. Furthermore, details are presented on how to compute confidence
limits on measurement accuracy so as to account for error in method evaluat
ion. The confidence limits are qualitatively different in the case that the
method undergoes extensive initial evaluation in comparison to a continual
re evaluation at each method application. To this end the statistical theo
ries of tolerance as well as more familiar types of confidence intervals ar
e applied. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of British Occupatio
nal Hygiene Society. All rights reserved.