Dc. Mackay et al., Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK, ANN RC SURG, 83(4), 2001, pp. 258-265
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND
To assist surgeons select a suitable prosthesis, we have undertaken a detai
led review of all shoulder and elbow replacements currently marketed in the
UK. Twenty shoulder and 8 elbow implants, manufactured by 16 companies, ha
ve been identified. Twelve of the shoulder and one of the elbow implants ha
ve been introduced or modified in the last 8 years and have no clinical res
ults published in peer-reviewed journals. Only the Biomodular, Bipolar, Cop
eland, Isoelastic, Neer hemi, Neer II, Roper-Day and Select shoulders accou
nting for less than 40% of the UK shoulder market, possess published result
s. The Capitello-condylar, Coonrad-Morrey, GSB III, Kudo, Liverpool, Roper-
Tuke and Souter-Strathclyde elbows all have published results. These accoun
t for over 95% of all UK elbow replacements. The implications of these find
ings in an era of evidence-based medicine is discussed. Reviewing the clini
cal results should be of primary importance in the selection of a suitable
prosthesis. Implants with a proven long-term record must represent the 'gol
d standard'. New or modified implants should only be used if they are part
of a properly conducted clinical trial.