Infection is still one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in
severely burned patients. Evidence suggests that many of the responsible or
ganisms are endogenous. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is not effective, a
nd produces resistant strains of microorganisms. SDD has been postulated to
be beneficial for controlling and decreasing infections in critically ill
patients. Its efficacy in severely burned patients. however, remains contro
versial. In order to analyze the efficacy of selective decontamination of t
he digestive (SDD) tract, to decrease the bacterial colonization of the aer
odigestive tract and burn wounds, and the incidence of septic complications
in severely burned children, 23 pediatric patients affected of severe burn
s were prospectively randomized in a double-blinded study. Eleven patients
received SDD (Polymyxin E, Tobramycin, and Amphotericin B), and 12 placebo.
Demographics, hospital course. microbiology results, complications, infect
ious episodes, and serum levels of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-oc were
compared to determine the efficacy of SDD. Colonization rates to the wound,
sputum, nasogastric aspirates, and feces were similar. Pneumonia. sepsis a
nd other complications had similar incidence in both groups. Serum levels o
f all cytokines studied were also comparable, suggesting a similar inflamma
tory status in all patients, regardless of the treatment received. Patients
in the SDD group, however, had a significantly higher incidence of diarrhe
a (P = 0.003). We can conclude that selective decontamination of the digest
ive tract with Polymixin E, Tobramycin and Amphotericin B is not effective
to decrease bacterial colonization and infectious episodes in severely burn
ed pediatric patients. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd and ISBI. All rights r
eserved.