Phylogenetic relationships of extant echinoderm classes

Authors
Citation
D. Janies, Phylogenetic relationships of extant echinoderm classes, CAN J ZOOL, 79(7), 2001, pp. 1232-1250
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE
ISSN journal
00084301 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1232 - 1250
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4301(200107)79:7<1232:PROEEC>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
A well-supported phylogeny of echinoderm classes has eluded morphological, embryological, molecular, and combined analyses. From this body of work it is apparent that (i) echinoids (sea urchins) and holothuroids (sea cucumber s) are related, and (ii) crinoids (sea lilies) are the sister taxon to exta nt eleutherozoan classes (asteroids, ophiuroids, echinoids, and holothuroid s). However, the relationships of asteroids and ophiuroids to other echinod erm classes have been difficult to recover. To address relationships betwee n the asteroids and ophiuroids and other echinoderms, I have sequenced addi tional nuclear loci and taxa and used novel computational approaches for co -optimizing morphological with molecular evidence at the level of sequence alignment. Support for the monophyly of each class is strong. Support for a monophyletic Asteroidea + Xyloplax is as strong as for Asteroidea. Support for Asterozoa (Asteroidea + Ophiuroidea) is apparent, albeit not as strong as for other clades (e.g., Echinozoa, Eleutherozoa, and Echinodermata). I also present detailed sensitivity analyses to provide (i) a test of the mon ophyly of groups under a variety of evolutionary models and (ii) a statemen t of the evidential value of various character systems.