Aquaculture effluent as a water and nutrient source for hay production in the seasonally dry tropics

Citation
E. Valencia et al., Aquaculture effluent as a water and nutrient source for hay production in the seasonally dry tropics, COMM SOIL S, 32(7-8), 2001, pp. 1293-1301
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
00103624 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
7-8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1293 - 1301
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-3624(2001)32:7-8<1293:AEAAWA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
In the water-limited environment of the U.S. Virgin Islands, tank culture o f Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is gaining importance. A by-product of in tensive fish culture is a nutrient-rich wastewater (effluent). It is not kn own if effluent can replace the nitrogen (N) fertilizer required by guineag rass (Panicum maximum Jacq.) managed for hay. This study was conducted from 1997 to 1999 to compare the effects of irrigated aquaculture effluent (AE) and inorganic N rates of 60 kg ha(-1) (N-60) and 0 (N-0)' on dry matter (D M) yield, forage crude protein concentration (CP), and in vitro organic mat ter disappearance (IVOMD), soil pH and phosphorous (P). Aquaculture effluen t was applied at 2 cm ha(-1) wk(-1) to guineagrass for an 18-wk period in 1 997 and 1999 but not in 1998. Guineagrass plots were harvested at eight-wk intervals (three eight-wk harvests in 1997, 1998, and 1999). Effluent DM yi eld (three harvests in 1997; 14.0 Mg ha(-1)) was similar(P >0.05) to N-60(1 3.0 Mg ha(-1)). In 1998, effluent DM yield (three harvests; 13.7 Mg ha-1) w as higher (P <0.05) than N-60 (9.8 Mg ha(-1)) suggesting a slow release N f rom the effluent. In 1999, AE out-yielded N60 by more than 50%. There was a trend for higher CP (9.6%) for the AE compared to (8.6%) for the N60 in 19 97. In 1999, AE was two percentage units higher (P <0.05) in CP (10.3%) com pared to N-60 (8.3%). In vitro organic matter disappearance in 1997 and 199 9 were similar for all treatments and averaged 56% and 61%, respectively. T here were no changes in soil pH (7.8) and P (22 mg kg(-1)), averaged across treatments. These results confirm that aquaculture effluent is an excellen t N and water source for forages in the dry season and can replace the inor ganic N requirements of guineagrass. The results should encourage the utili zation of this effluent as a fertilizer rather than disposition to the envi ronment.