Heavy-metal uptake by metal-tolerant Elsholtzia haichowensis and Commelinacommunis from China

Citation
Sr. Tang et al., Heavy-metal uptake by metal-tolerant Elsholtzia haichowensis and Commelinacommunis from China, COMM SOIL S, 32(5-6), 2001, pp. 895-905
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
00103624 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
5-6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
895 - 905
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-3624(2001)32:5-6<895:HUBMEH>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Elsholtzia haichowensis Sun and Commelina communis L. are the most widely d istributed heavy-metal-tolerant plants in the areas along the middle and lo wer streams of the Yangtze River, China. Both plant species were grown in p ot trials involving three different treatments containing 3-12 mg kg(-1) ca dmium (Cd), 37-140 mg kg(-1) copper (Cu), 30-101 mg kg(-1) chromium (Cr), < 3-9 mg kg(-1) nickel (Ni), 66-224 mg kg(-1) lead (Pb), and 1,000-2,850 mg k g(-1) zinc (Zn). Hydroponic trials were also conducted using Cd, Cu, and Zn only. Both species accumulated much higher concentrations (by a factor of about ten) of copper and other heavy metals in the roots than in the shoots , following a typical pattern of metal-excluder plants. The metal concentra tions in the plant tissues, especially the roots, of E. haichowensis and C. communis were positively correlated to the metal concentrations in the gro wth media. With increasing heavy metal concentrations in the root media, th e shoot biomass yields of E. haichowensis increased, but the root yields sh owed no significant variation. Shoot or root dry biomass of C. communis inc reased in the case of the pot trials but decreased in the hydroponic cultur e fi om the low metal to high metal treatments. The results suggest that E. haichowensis may be a better biogeochemical indicator than C. communis for ore exploration and both may also be used fur phytostabilization of toxic mine spoils because of their tolerance to heavy metal. It is pro posed that although either roots or shoots could be used for biogeochemical prospecti ng, shoot sampling would be easier and more cost-effective.