Actual cation exchange capacity of agricultural soils and its relationshipwith pH and content of organic carbon and clay

Citation
Pj. Van Erp et al., Actual cation exchange capacity of agricultural soils and its relationshipwith pH and content of organic carbon and clay, COMM SOIL S, 32(1-2), 2001, pp. 19-31
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
ISSN journal
00103624 → ACNP
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
19 - 31
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-3624(2001)32:1-2<19:ACECOA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
For the set up of a multinutrient 0.01 M calcium chloride (CaCl2) soil test ing program a conversion from conventional soil testing programs to a CaCl2 program has been proposed in literature. Such conversion should be based o n the relationship between test values of the conventional method and the C aCl2 method. For magnesium (Mg) it was shown in earlier work that the conve rsion could be improved when the actual cation exchange capacity (CEC) of t he soil, CECact, was taken into account. However, determination of CECact n ecessitates an extra analytical procedure. The goal of this study was to te st a procedure for estimating CECact of a soil. In this procedure, CECact w as calculated as the summation of the estimated charge of organic carbon (C ) and clay in the soil at pH(act). the actual pH of the soil. A series of 3 9 test soils representing agricultural soils in The Netherlands was used to derive the pH dependency of the negative charge of organic C and clay. The following relationship was found: CECact: [M(1)X0.0624] + [M(2)X(0.295-D(2 )(pHact))]. In this relationship, M(1) and M(2) represent clay and organic C in g kg(-1) dry soil, respectively, and D(2)(pHact) the difference in neg ative charge of organic C at pH(act) and pH 8.1. The pH(act) equals pH meas ured in 0.01 M CaCl2. The relationship was tested on another dataset of 38 agricultural soils. There was good agreement between the calculated and mea sured CECact (R-2=0.89). It was concluded that the procedure can be used fo r estimation of CECact..