Missile defence and the transatlantic security relationship

This article examines the re-emergence of ballistic missile defence (BMD) a s a contentious issue in US-European security relations since 1999. It begi ns by outlining three phases in the recent evolution of US missile defence policy from 1995 to mid-2001. The article then examines five key factors th at have dominated European views and concerns in relation to BMD: a diverge nce between European and American assessments of the emerging ballistic mis sile threat; concern over the implications for nuclear arms control stemmin g from Russian and Chinese opposition to BMD; the impact of missile defence on deterrence and the Atlantic alliance; scepticism about the technologica l feasibility of BMD; and the potential opportunity costs associated with r esource allocation to missile defence. It is shown that European anxieties have been exacerbated by a perception of a growing unilateralism in America n security policy in recent years. The article proceeds by arguing that the US-European debate over BMD looks set to evolve in one of two directions. The more Likely and most desirable scenario would involve the US reaching a n understanding with its European allies on the way forward. The less desir able scenario would involve key European countries, such as France and Germ any, deciding ultimately to withhold their political support for BMD, which would have the potential of causing significant rifts in both transatlanti c and intra-European security relations. In both cases, it is argued that t he BMD debate will be defined by the interaction of several key variables. These include the extent to which the Bush administration engages in meanin gful consultations with the Europeans; the administration's ability or othe rwise to reach an agreement with Russia on the way ahead; the architecture options of a future allied or global BMD system; the related issues of tech nological feasibility and financial cost; and the evolving missile threat.