Ma. Mont et al., Strut-autografting with and without osteogenic protein-1 - A preliminary study of a canine femoral head defect model, J BONE-AM V, 83A(7), 2001, pp. 1013-1022
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Background: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head frequently leads to collapse
of the articular cartilage and to disabling osteoarthritis, which ultimatel
y may necessitate joint arthroplasty. One treatment method that has had mod
erate success is the so-called trapdoor approach, which involves excavation
of diseased (necrotic) bone followed by bone-grafting. Augmentation of thi
s procedure with various growth and differentiation factors may improve the
outcome. We developed a canine model that mimics the clinical situation wi
th trapdoor bone-grafting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the
effect of the addition of osteogenic protein-1 on healing following the tra
pdoor procedure with strut-autografting.
Methods: Thirty-four skeletally mature dogs were used in the experiment. Af
ter capsulotomy, a trapdoor was created in the anterolateral surface of the
femoral head and a 2-cm-diameter subchondral area of bone was removed. In
the phase-I experiments, seven dogs had no treatment of the defect (Group I
) and nine dogs were treated with strut-grafting (Group II). In phase II, t
he procedure was modified by collapsing the trapdoor into the created defec
t intraoperatively in eighteen dogs, which were divided into three equal gr
oups: six untreated defects were left collapsed (Group III), six were treat
ed with bone graft (Group IV), and six were treated with bone graft augment
ed with osteogenic protein-1 (Group V).
Results: Three of the seven femoral heads in Group I (untreated defect) and
one of the nine heads in Group II (grafting without collapsing of the trap
door) had evidence of cartilage collapse. Inspection of sagittal slices and
radiographs revealed an unfilled residual defect in all Group-I heads, whe
reas all Group-ii heads were well healed. The mean normalized stiffness val
ue was significantly larger in Group II than it was in Group I. On visual i
nspection, depression was noted in all of the femoral heads in Group ill (u
ntreated defect; trapdoor left collapsed). In both Group IV and Group V (gr
afting without and with osteogenic protein-1), the trapdoor cartilage appea
red to be essentially normal. Groups IV and V had more radiographic healing
than did Group Ill. The defects in Group V (grafting with osteogenic prote
in-1) healed faster radiographically than did those in Group IV (grafting w
ithout osteogenic protein-1).
Conclusions: Moderate-to-excellent healing was seen both radiographically a
nd biomechanically by four months in the groups treated with grafting, with
and without osteogenic protein-1, whereas untreated defects did not heal.
Clinical Relevance: Symptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a clin
ical challenge. The animal model in the current study is a useful tool for
the evaluation of methods to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Studi
es investigating additional time-periods between implantation of osteogenic
protein-1 and assessment of results as well as different doses of osteogen
ic protein-1 are warranted.