Failed AAA endograft exclusion due to type II endoleak: Explant analysis

Citation
Ra. White et al., Failed AAA endograft exclusion due to type II endoleak: Explant analysis, J ENDOVAS T, 8(3), 2001, pp. 254-261
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY
ISSN journal
15266028 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
254 - 261
Database
ISI
SICI code
1526-6028(200106)8:3<254:FAEEDT>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Purpose: To report the patient history and analysis of an explanted modular bifurcated endograft that was implanted to exclude an abdominal aortic ane urysm (AAA). Case Report: An 80-year-old man with a 6-cm AAA underwent uneventful endova scular implantation of a bifurcated AneuRx stent-graft. His postprocedural clinical course was uneventful, although persistent contrast enhancement of the aneurysm remained via the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). By 6 month s, an endoleak connecting to the lumbar and mesenteric arteries became appa rent. Over the ensuing 12 months, the endoleak and aneurysm enlarged; branc h artery embolization was attempted in 4 percutaneous procedures. Despite s uccessful IMA occlusion, the aneurysm continued to increase in diameter and volume, necessitating conversion to a conventional bypass at 20 months. An alysis of the explanted specimen revealed an intact endograft with fibrous incorporation of the stent framework at the proximal and distal fixation si tes only; no incorporation of the endograft was noted within the aneurysm. The feeding channel for the endoleak was not identified. Conclusions: Serial imaging is a vital component of endograft surveillance, and persistent type II endoleaks that cannot be completely embolized endan ger the longevity of the aneurysm exclusion. Explant analysis can play an i mportant role in understanding the mechanisms of endograft failure.