During the final testing stage of a genetic algorithm based global search p
rocedure, designed to determine low energy conformations of oligopeptides,
in the gas phase we found two significantly different conformations of Leu-
enkephalin with similar lowest energy values. Both conformers have been pre
viously reported as being the global minimum for this pentapeptide. These s
tructures differ by 0.135 kcal/mol and have an all atom RMS of 3.2 Angstrom
. One of these conformers was reported by Glasser and Scheraga (J. Mel. Bio
l., 199 (1988)513) using the diffusion equation method, and the other was r
eported by Klepeis and Floudas (J. Comput. Chem. 20 (1999) 636) using a det
erministic Branch and Bound method. Both papers report use of the ECEPP ene
rgy function. However, there is no further report that will help in clarify
ing which one of these two low energy conformations for Leu-enkephalin is t
he true global energy minimum within the ECEPP formalism. It is known that
the bottom of the energy well of protein empirical potentials is rugged and
that it allows the coexistence of many conformers. The questions are wheth
er these conformers have similar or different secondary structure parameter
s, and which one of these corresponds to the global energy minimum. To help
solve this crux we reevaluated the potential energy of the two Leu-enkepha
lin structures mentioned above with different force fields, with and withou
t solvent effects. The results indicate that the structure reported by Glas
ser and Scheraga is the most stable conformer for Leu-enkephalin. (C) 2001
Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.