Advancing scientific discourse in the controversy surrounding the comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A rejoinder to Meyer (2000)

A recent commentary by Meyer (2000) in the Journal of Personality Assessmen t alleged that Rorschach critic Wood and his colleagues had intentionally p ublished information that they knew to be in error. To substantiate this co ntention, Meyer's commentary published information that was part of the pee r review process at another journal. In this rejoinder, we present factual information that shows we have consistently acted in good faith. This rejoi nder suggests that the scientific debate regarding the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach is unlikely to be advanced by speculating about the inte ntions of Rorschach critics, or by publishing information from the peer rev iew process that is usually kept confidential.