Amodiaquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and combination therapy for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kampala, Uganda: a randomised trial
Sg. Staedke et al., Amodiaquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and combination therapy for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kampala, Uganda: a randomised trial, LANCET, 358(9279), 2001, pp. 368-374
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background Increasing Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine in su
b-Saharan Africa necessitates use of alternative antimalarial agents. Affor
dable alternative treatments include sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and amodiaqu
ine. Combination of antimalarial agents can increase therapeutic efficacy a
nd delay emergence of drug resistance. We compared the efficacy of sulfadox
ine/ pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and an amodiaquine/ sulfadoxine/pyrimetham
ine combination for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in a region of high
chloroquine resistance.
Methods Patients with symptoms of uncomplicated falciparum malaria and conf
irmed disease in Kampala, Uganda, were randomly assigned to receive sulfado
xine/pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg sulfadoxine, and 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine) plu
s placebo; amodiaquine (25 mg/kg) plus placebo; or amodiaquine plus sulfado
xine/pyrimethamine. Patients were followed up for 14 days, and clinical and
parasitological outcomes were assessed.
Findings 90% (400/445) of patients enrolled in the study successfully compl
eted 14 days of follow-up. Treatment failure based on clinical criteria occ
urred in 13 of 131 (10%) patients on sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine, nine of 13
1 (7%) on amodiaquine, and four of 138 (3%) on amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyri
methamine. Based on parasitological criteria, treatment failed in 26%, 16%,
and 10% of these patients, respectively. Amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimetha
mine was significantly more effective than sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine alone
in children aged younger than 5 years (clinical failure in 3.5% vs 13.9%, r
espectively, risk difference 10.4% [95% CI, 1.6-19-3] p=0.021; parasitologi
cal failure in 12.8% vs 26.4%, risk difference 13.6% [1.2-26.0] p=0.041).
Interpretation Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and amodiaquine/sulf
adoxine/pyrimethamine were all effective for treatment of uncomplicated fal
ciparum malaria in Uganda. The amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine combi
nation was the most effective, and could be the optimum low-cost alternativ
e to chloroquine in Africa.