Background: Up to 50% of ail cases of postpartum depression go undetected.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) has been the only instrumen
t available that was specifically designed to screen for this mood disorder
. None of the items on the EPDS, however, are written in the context of new
motherhood.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to further assess the construct va
lidity of the newly designed Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (PDSS) a
long with its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values.
Method: A total sample of 150 mothers within 12 weeks postpartum participat
ed in the study. Each mother completed in random order three questionnaires
: The PDSS, EPDS, and The Beck Depression Inventory-ii (BDI-II). immediatel
y after completing these three questionnaires, each woman was interviewed b
y a nurse psychotherapist using the Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-I
V Axis 1 Disorders.
Results: Twelve percent (n = 18) of the mothers were diagnosed with major p
ostpartum depression, 19% (n = 28) with minor postpartum depression, and 69
% (n = 104) with no depression. The PDSS was strongly correlated with both
the BDI-II (r = 0.81) and the EPDS (r = 0.79). The ability of the PDSS to e
xplain variance in diagnostic classification of postpartum depression above
that explained by the BDI-II and EPDS (i.e., incremental validity) was ass
essed using hierarchical regression. After explaining variance in group cla
ssification by the other two depression instruments, the PDSS explained an
additional 9% of the variance in depression diagnosis. Using receiver opera
ting characteristic (ROC) curves, a PDSS cut-off score of 80 (sensitivity 9
4% and specificity 98%) is recommended for major postpartum depression and
a cut-off score of 60 (sensitivity 91% and specificity 72%) for major or mi
nor depression.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this psychometric testing, the PDSS is
considered ready for use in routine screening of mothers.