Weight reduction by means of intragastric device: Experience with the bioenterics intragastric balloon

Citation
E. Totte et al., Weight reduction by means of intragastric device: Experience with the bioenterics intragastric balloon, OBES SURG, 11(4), 2001, pp. 519-523
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
OBESITY SURGERY
ISSN journal
09608923 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
519 - 523
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-8923(200108)11:4<519:WRBMOI>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Background: A new intragastric balloon is available for weight reduction. Methods: Patients consulting for a weight reduction plan and refusing any k ind of actual surgery, or suffering from obesity but not meeting the IFSO s tandards for surgery, were offered the possibility of weight reduction by t he BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB). A preoperative questionnaire was completed by all patients, inquiring about medical history, co-morbidity f actors, dietary habits, previous treatments for weight and social, psycholo gical, relational and economic impact of the obesity. BIB placement was don e on an inpatient basis, under general anesthesia. Inflation was standardiz ed at 500 mi saline. Intravenous antiemetic and spasmolytic drugs were give n to control post-insertion nausea for 24 hours, and oral medication was ad ministered on the patient's discharge. A standard 800 calorie diet was pres cribed after dietitian's consultation. Extraction of the balloon was left t o the patient's discretion at 3 or maximum 6 months after placement. Patien ts choosing for the maximal period received a formal invitation to extract the balloon. Evaluation of weight reduction was done at extraction and by q uestionnaire. Results: 126 patients (5M, 121 F) with mean age of 35.6 years (20-62) were included after preoperative evaluation. Mean preoperative BMI was 37.7 kg/m (2) (26.7-57.7 kg/m(2)), with a mean initial excessive weight of 35.3 kg (8 .8-96.4 kg) and mean initial % excess weight of 32.2 (6.3-102). 69 patients were eligible for review; mean excess weight loss after 3 months was 48.6% and after 6 months 50.8%. Mean weight loss was 15.4 kg (0-35 kg). 76.8% of the patients (41/69) complained of severe nausea and vomiting lasting an a verage of 1 week (1 day-6 months), resulting in 3 patients in early removal of the balloon (at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month after placement respectively). 2 patients suffered gastric perforation presenting as acute peritonitis 3 an d 4 months after placement and were operated. Extraction of the balloon was performed in 3 patients after 3 months and in 66 patients after 6 months. In 11 patients (22%), esophagitis was present (8 grade 1, 2 grade II, 1 gra de III), and one patient showed diffuse gastric erosion. One patient requir ed removal of the balloon by rigid esphagoscopy following technical failure of the endoscopic extraction device. 45 patients replied to the mailed que stionnaire; 15% (7/45) were very satisfied, 13% (6/45) satisfied, 22% (10/4 5) reasonably satisfied, 8.8% (4/45) unsatisfied and 40% very unsatisfied. Degree of satisfaction correlated poorly with weight loss. Results may be b etter with close continuous guidance by a counselor. Conclusion: BIB as a means of weight reduction in the obese patient led to a 50.8% loss of excess weight after 6 months. Although severe morbidity can occur, the BIB provides a means for short-term weight reduction in conjunc tion with dietary measures.