Cerebral palsy in Northern Ireland: 1981-93

Citation
J. Parkes et al., Cerebral palsy in Northern Ireland: 1981-93, PAED PERIN, 15(3), 2001, pp. 278-286
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
02695022 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
278 - 286
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-5022(200107)15:3<278:CPINI1>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
This paper describes the method of compilation of the Northern Ireland Cere bral Palsy Register (NICPR) and outlines the epidemiology of cerebral palsy (CP) in Northern Ireland in 1981-93 based on an analysis of 784 cases. Mul tiple and overlapping sources of notification were used to compile the NICP R. Each case was followed up with a standardised assessment completed at ag e 5 years and validated by a paediatrician. Over 70% of cases were multiply notified, and paediatricians were the most important source of notificatio n. Cases of CP most likely to be under-ascertained included those very mild ly affected, cases who died before the register began (death certificates w ere searched but found to be unreliable) and cases who moved out of the are a before their diagnosis was confirmed. The prevalence of CP for the birth period 1981-93 was 2.24 per 1000 livebirths [95% CI 2.08, 2.40]. There were no statistically significant temporal or geographic variations in the rate of CP. Almost half the cases of CP were of low birthweight (< 2500 g), and this proportion increased during 1987-89, but decreased (P < 0.01) more re cently (1990-93). The proportion of cases weighing < 1000 g trebled from 3% in 1981-83 to 10% in 1990-93 (P < 0.01). The most common CP subtype was bi lateral spastic cerebral palsy (55%). Just over a quarter (29%) of cases we re unable to walk (with/without aids), and one-fifth (22%) had no useful ha nd/arm function. Almost half (49%) the cases had at least one other impairm ent (intellectual, sensory impairment or active seizures) in association wi th their CP. Prevalence rates and the pattern of disability in populations of people with CP can only be evaluated on the basis of the methods of case definition and ascertainment. We have demonstrated the methods necessary t o ensure valid, standard and detailed information on CP for the purposes of surveillance, service planning and research.