This paper uses a simple spatial model of urban employment to demonstrate t
hat the relationship between spatial mismatch and commuting times is indete
rminate if employment probabilities decline as the distance from job site t
o residence increases. Specifically, if employment probabilities decline fa
ster (slower) than a threshold rate, then spatial mismatch will decrease (i
ncrease) the commuting times of central-city minorities. Thus, commuting-ba
sed tests of the spatial mismatch hypothesis are not just biased but mis-sp
ecified because spatial mismatch is theoretically consistent with both the
null and alternative hypotheses. Evidence that this concern is empirically
important is taken from the 'contradictory' findings of recent studies that
use commutes to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis.