S. Fauser et al., Differential activation of microglial cells in local and remote areas of IRBP1169-1191-induced rat uveitis, ACT NEUROP, 101(6), 2001, pp. 565-571
Using a Lewis rat model of interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRB
P)-induced experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) we examined cellular react
ions in the optic pathway (retina, choroid, optic nerve, optic tract, colli
culus superior, and visual cortex). Two to six animals were studied at days
0, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18 and 22 after immunization by immunohistochemis
try with monoclonal antibodies against EDI, ED2, OX6, OX22, EMAP II, AIF-1
and W3/13. In the retina, choroid and distal optic nerve increased immunore
activity to EDI, OX6, OX22, EMAP II, ArF-1 and W3/13 was initially observed
at day 9, peaked at days 13-14 and diminished rapidly from day 18 onwards.
No changes were seen in the density of ED2-positive resident macrophages.
In the optic tract, ED1 and OX6 expression was induced in microglial cells
beginning with day 11 and persisted until day 22. AIF-1, EMAP II and ED2 ex
pression was not visibly up-regulated and no lymphocytic infiltrates (OX22-
, W3/13-positive cells) were observed. In the central projection fields, no
cellular reaction could be found. Thus, cellular response in IRBP-induced
rat uveoretinitis is not restricted to the eye. Microglial activation is al
so seen in the distal optic nerve and optic tract. This remote microglial a
ctivation, however, differs in intensity, time course and expression of act
ivation markers, thus indicating different activation cascades. The mild re
mote microglial activation is probably due to neuronal-microglial interacti
ons resulting from neuronal damage in the retinal ganglion cell layer and n
erve fiber layer with consecutive axonal degeneration and not from an infla
mmatory reaction as seen in the eye.