Three-dimensional (3D) navigation systems are routinely used in the fields
of endoscopic skull base surgery, neurosurgery, maxillo-facial and endoscop
ic sinus surgery. The use of such systems is associated with the following
advantages: a better 3D orientation; a more confident surgeon; a more preci
se surgical approach; and a reduced operation time. Six different brands of
3D navigation system were compared in order to find out if there are major
differences in performance and whether the considerable financial investme
nt required to purchase such a system would be justified by a noticeable im
provement in surgical interventions and a realization of the above expectat
ions. The 3D navigation systems were tested by performing endoscopic sinus
surgery on 26 patients suffering from chronic sinusitis. The system accurac
y, the confidence of the surgeon, the time of anaesthesia, the cost, the nu
mber of personnel required (and their skills), and the technical resources
were compared. No major differences in performance of the different brands
of 3D navigation system were noticed. All of the systems showed high, but v
arying, system precision, the surgeons felt more confident and the time of
anaesthesia was prolonged by 5-15 min. A well-trained operating staff is re
quired. Assuming that the initial costs are excluded and that data transfer
occurs automatically, personnel costs and the extra time required still ha
ve to be considered.