Assessing symptoms before hysterectomy: Is the medical record accurate?

Citation
Ms. Broder et al., Assessing symptoms before hysterectomy: Is the medical record accurate?, AM J OBST G, 185(1), 2001, pp. 97-102
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029378 → ACNP
Volume
185
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
97 - 102
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9378(200107)185:1<97:ASBHIT>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the agreement between the documentat ion of symptoms leading to hysterectomy and the assessment of those symptom s by the patient. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed of 497 women in southern California who had hysterectomies. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa stat istics were calculated for the medical records and were compared with patie nt interviews for the presence and severity of symptoms. RESULTS: The medical record was 93% sensitive and 61% specific for identify ing bleeding and 79% sensitive and 55% specific for identifying pain. Overa ll agreement between physician records and patient interviews was moderate for bleeding (kappa, 0.56-0.58), fair for pain (kappa, 0.29-0.34), and poor for impairment as a result of bleeding or pain (kappa, 0.0-0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Physician overestimation of symptoms could lead to overuse of hysterectomy, whereas underestimation could result In underuse. Our results suggest that both underestimation and overestimation occur for patients wi th abnormal bleeding, pain, or both. If physicians accurately assess sympto ms but fail to document them, examinations of appropriateness will be fault y unless patients are interviewed.