In paleopathology it is usually assumed that modern diagnostic criteria can
be applied to infectious diseases in the past. However; as both the human
species and populations of pathogenic microorganisms undergo evolutionary c
hanges, this assumption is not always well-founded. To get valid estimates
of the frequency (the point prevalence at death) of leprosy in skeletal sam
ples, sensitivity, specificity, and sample frequency must be estimated simu
ltaneously. It is shown that more than three symptoms must be evaluated in
at least three samples in order to reach estimates with well-described prop
erties. The method is applied to three skeletal samples from Medieval Denma
rk; the samples were scored for the presence of seven osteological conditio
ns indicating leprosy. For the osteological conditions, sensitivity varied
from 0.36-0.80, and specificity from 0.58-0.98. The frequency of leprosy in
the three samples was: Odense (a lepers' institution), 0.98, 95% CI 0.64-1
.00; Malmo (urban cemetery), 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.07; and Tirup (rural cemet
ery), 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.46. It is concluded that it is indeed possible to
estimate disease frequencies without reference to modern standards, and th
at leprosy occurred with widely differing frequencies in different segments
of the Medieval population in southern Scandinavia. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, I
nc.