A study of intensified dietary support in underweight candidates for lung transplantation

Citation
L. Forli et al., A study of intensified dietary support in underweight candidates for lung transplantation, ANN NUTR M, 45(4), 2001, pp. 159-168
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
02506807 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
159 - 168
Database
ISI
SICI code
0250-6807(200107/08)45:4<159:ASOIDS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background. No data is available on dietary intervention in candidates for lung transplantation and on the effect of different strategies for dietary support in this cohort. Aim: We therefore wanted to evaluate the effects of intensified nutritional support compared with simple support on energy int ake and nutritional status. Method. Our participants were underweight (n = 42) and normal-weight (control group, n = 29) candidates for lung transplan tation. The underweight patients were randomized into two groups. Group A r eceived intensified dietary counselling, ready-made liquid nutritional supp lements free of charge and regular follow-ups, while group B received only one session of individual dietary counselling, no supplements and no follow -ups. Results: The mean intervention time was 21 weeks. Groups A and B both increased their energy intake and gained weight. Group A increased their e nergy intake from a median of 8.7 to 10.1 MJ (p < 0.01 compared with the co ntrol group after intervention) and gained a mean of 2.9 kg body weight (95 % Cl 1.2; 4.7, p = 0.005 compared with the control group), while group B in creased from 7.4 to 10.8 MJ (p = 0.005) and gained 2.3 kg (1.2; 3.3, p = 0. 002). Only group B increased their fat-free mass. In this group, an increas e in O-2 saturation and a decrease in PaCO2 were suggested. None of the gro ups improved its physical performance. Conclusion: In candidates for lung t ransplantation we were unable to confirm the hypothesis that intensified nu tritional support compared with a simple support increased compliance. Both groups achieved the goal for energy intake and gained weight. Copyright (C ) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.