Background. No data is available on dietary intervention in candidates for
lung transplantation and on the effect of different strategies for dietary
support in this cohort. Aim: We therefore wanted to evaluate the effects of
intensified nutritional support compared with simple support on energy int
ake and nutritional status. Method. Our participants were underweight (n =
42) and normal-weight (control group, n = 29) candidates for lung transplan
tation. The underweight patients were randomized into two groups. Group A r
eceived intensified dietary counselling, ready-made liquid nutritional supp
lements free of charge and regular follow-ups, while group B received only
one session of individual dietary counselling, no supplements and no follow
-ups. Results: The mean intervention time was 21 weeks. Groups A and B both
increased their energy intake and gained weight. Group A increased their e
nergy intake from a median of 8.7 to 10.1 MJ (p < 0.01 compared with the co
ntrol group after intervention) and gained a mean of 2.9 kg body weight (95
% Cl 1.2; 4.7, p = 0.005 compared with the control group), while group B in
creased from 7.4 to 10.8 MJ (p = 0.005) and gained 2.3 kg (1.2; 3.3, p = 0.
002). Only group B increased their fat-free mass. In this group, an increas
e in O-2 saturation and a decrease in PaCO2 were suggested. None of the gro
ups improved its physical performance. Conclusion: In candidates for lung t
ransplantation we were unable to confirm the hypothesis that intensified nu
tritional support compared with a simple support increased compliance. Both
groups achieved the goal for energy intake and gained weight. Copyright (C
) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.