In this article we examine how questions in two different domains are simil
ar : work on reasoning by analog), and that of implicit learning. There is
a disagreement between theories that associate transfer with generalization
of knowledge, and theories that associate transfer with memorization of ex
amples. First, we present a review of research from these two domains, prop
osing the hypothesis that abstract rules and examples can be elaborated con
jointly. Then, we show that this hypothesis is plausible with regard to wor
k concerning the organization of knowledge in experts, and we discuss the p
otential type of relations between these processes. Finally, we discuss the
contributions of a comparison between the domain of reasoning by analogy a
nd that of implicit learning.