The evaluation of left ventricular systolic function is based on endocardia
l fractional shortening measured by M mode or left ventricular ejection fra
ction measured by M mode and 2D echocardiography.
The interpretation of the results is difficult: fractional shortening and e
jection fraction may change if the intrinsic contractility of the LV is mod
ified but also when the conditions of load are different when the intrinsic
contractility is unchanged. In hypertensives, the after-load may be increa
sed, especially when the increased pressure is not "correctly" compensated
by geometrical changes of the left ventricle (Laplace's law).
Therefore, to interpret the indices of UV contractility of the hypertensive
patient correctly, several approaches are possible.
At the least, it is important to calculate end-systolic stress (from parame
ters available from M mode recordings of the LV and systolic blood pressure
); using the values of stress, it is possible to calculate a range of norma
l endocardial fractional shortening for a given patient and compare it with
the measured fractional shortening.
It is also useful to measure not only the endocardial but the midwall fract
ional shortening because this is where the circumferential fibres which sho
rten the LV short axis are found. Normal midwall fractional shortening is l
ess than normal endocardial fractional shortening because the circumferenti
al fibres have a relatively more epicardial than endocardial migration.
For a reliable estimation of the quality of LV contraction, the best approa
ch is to calculate automatically the expected theoretical endocardial and m
idwall fractional shortening and to compare them with the measured values.
In certain cases, it is possible to conclude that LV contractility is abnor
mal despite normal endocardial fractional shortening or, on the other hand,
that LV contractility is normal despite low values of fractional shortenin
g.