Relationship between systemic markers of inflammation and serum beta-carotene levels

Citation
Tp. Erlinger et al., Relationship between systemic markers of inflammation and serum beta-carotene levels, ARCH IN MED, 161(15), 2001, pp. 1903-1908
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
161
Issue
15
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1903 - 1908
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(20010813)161:15<1903:RBSMOI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background: Low serum levels of beta -carotene have been associated with in creased risk of cancer and cardiovascular disease. However, in clinical tri als, supplementation of the diet with beta -carotene either had no benefit or caused harm. This pattern of findings raises the possibility that confou nding by other factors might explain the association between serum beta -ca rotene level and disease risk. Methods: We used data from 14470 current smokers, ex-smokers, and never smo kers aged 18 years or older who participated in the Third National Health a nd Nutrition Examination Survey to assess the relationship between serum be ta -carotene and markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein and white bloo d cell count). Results: After adjustment for beta -carotene intake and other factors, geom etric mean levels of serum beta -carotene for individuals with undetectable (<0.22 mg/dL), mildly elevated (0.22-0.99 mg/dQ, and clinically elevated ( greater than or equal to1.0 mg/dQ C-reactive protein levels were 18.0, 16.1 , and 13.6 mug/dL, respectively, in never smokers; 18.1, 15.7, and 13.9 mug /dL in ex-smokers; and 11.3, 10.2, and 9.4 mug/dL in current smokers (P < . 001 for all). In corresponding analyses, white blood cell count was also in versely related to serum beta -carotene concentration (P < .05 for all). Conclusions: The strong and inverse association of serum beta -carotene lev el with C-reactive protein level and white blood cell count suggests that t he relationship between serum beta -carotene concentration and disease risk might be confounded by inflammation. More broadly, for beta -carotene and likely other nutrients, it seems unwise to interpret biomarker data as prim a facie evidence of dietary intake without a more complete understanding of the physiologic processes that affect nutrient levels.