Objective: To evaluate difficulties encountered in genetic counseling in de
af children carrying connexin 26 gene (CX26 or GJB2) mutations.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Outpatients, tertiary referral center Patients: Ninety-six unrelat
ed deaf children in whom CX26 mutations had been detected consecutively. Ch
ildren were recruited to a center for genetic counseling for deaf children,
and all had congenital deafness, sporadic or familial.
Results: In 63 children, deafness was clearly a DFNB1 form with autosomal r
ecessive inheritance: 47 of the 63 were homozygous for the most frequent mu
tation, the deletion of G at position 35 (35delG); 16 of 63 carried on both
alleles of CX26 frameshift or stop mutations, or missense mutations affect
ing a critical region of the gene. In 33 of 96 children, genetic counseling
was difficult: 21 of 33 had a single mutation detected, 11 of 33 had new m
issense mutations or mutations whose pathogenicity remains debated in the l
iterature, and 1 of 33 had a genotype with both a recessive mutation (35del
G) and a mutation acting as a dominant mutation.
Conclusions: Interpretation of results for the molecular diagnosis of mutat
ions in the connexin 26 gene is difficult in almost one third of cases. Clo
se collaboration between geneticists familiar with deafness and otolaryngol
ogists is essential to provide a high standard of genetic advice.