How does evolution grow bigger brains? It has been widely assumed that grow
th of individual structures and functional systems in response to niche-spe
cific cognitive challenges is the most plausible mechanism for brain expans
ion in mammals. Comparison of multiple regressions on allometric data for 1
31 mammalian species, however, suggests that for 9 of 11 brain structures t
axonomic and body size factors are less important than covariance of these
major structures with each other. Which structure grows biggest is largely
predicted by a conserved order of neurogenesis that can be derived from the
basic axi tl structure of the developing brain. This conserved order of ne
urogenesis predicts the relative scaling not only of gross brain regions li
ke the isocortex or mesencephalon, but also the level of detail of individu
al thalamic nuclei. Special selection of particular areas for specific func
tions does occur, but it is a minor factor compared to the large-scale cova
riance of the whole brain. The idea that enlarged isocortex could be a "spa
ndrel," a by-product of structural constraints later adapted for various be
haviors, contrasts with approaches to selection of particular brain regions
for cognitively advanced uses, as is commonly assumed in the case of homin
id brain evolution.