Although the majority of commentators implicitly or explicitly accept that
field data allow us to ascribe culture to whales, dolphins, and other nonhu
mans, there is no consensus. While we define culture as information or beha
viour shared by a population or subpopulation which is acquired from conspe
cifics through some form of social learning, some commentators suggest rest
ricting this by requiring imitation/teaching, human analogy, adaptiveness,
stability across generations, progressive evolution (ratchetting), or speci
fic functions. Such restrictions fall down because they either preclude the
attribution of culture to non-humans using currently available methods, or
exclude pal ts of human culture. The evidence for cetacean culture is stro
ng in some cases, but weak in others. The commentaries provide important in
formation on the social learning abilities of bottlenose dolphins and some
interesting speculation about the evolution of cetacean cultures and differ
ences between the cultures of different taxa. We maintain that some attribu
tes of cetacean culture are currently unknown outside humans. While experim
ental studies, both in the laboratory and in the wild, have an important ro
le in the study of culture in whales and dolphins (for instance in determin
ing whether dolphins have a Theory-of-Mind), the real treasures will. be un
covered by long-term observational studies at sea using new approaches and
technologies.