The complex relationship between attention and STM forms a core issue in di
e study of human cognition, and Cowan's target article attempts, quite succ
essfully, to elucidate an important part of this relationship. However, whi
le I agree that aspects of STM performance may reflect the action mechanism
s that we normally consider to subserve "attention" I shall argue here that
attention is not subject to a fixed four-object capacity limit as Cowan su
ggests. Rather, performance in attention tasks as well as STM may be best a
ccounted for in terms of decay and interference.