Cowan makes an intriguing case for a fundamental limit in the number of chu
nks that can be stored in short term memory (STM). Chunks are collections o
f concepts that have strong associations to one another and much weaker ass
ociations to other chunks. A translation of this definition for the visual
domain would be that a visual chunk is a collection of features that belong
to the same perceptual group (see also Mahoney & Ullman 1988). Here, we wi
ll first address the neuronal mechanisms that may demarcate visual chunks.
Then we critically evaluate to what extent these, mechanisms might be respo
nsible for the limit on the number of chunks that can be held in STM. We co
nclude that the clarity with which the psychophysical data point to the num
ber four is not matched by a similarly clear limit imposed by physiological
mechanisms.