The approach of Hobson et al. is limited to the description of global state
s of consciousness, although more detailed analyses of the specific content
s of consciousness would also be required. Furthermore, their account of th
e mind-brain relationship remains obscure. Nielsen's discussion suffers fro
nt conceptual and definitional unclarity. Mentation during sleep could be c
larified by reconceptualizing it its all issue about the contents of consci
ousness. Vertes & Eastman do not consider the types of memory (emotional) a
cid learning (implicit) that are relevant during REM sleep, and therefore d
ismiss on inadequate grounds the possibility of memory functions associated
with REM sleep.