This article describes methodological issues that arose from the author's r
esearch on early modem women's imprisonment in order to reflect on broader
questions about how crime and punishment are studied. She demonstrates that
the ways in which a criminologist interprets his or her data, what evidenc
e exists, and the emotional repercussions of writing on crime and punishmen
t reveal the researcher's ethical stance towards his or her subjects and th
e allegiances he or she creates with them. These problems of interpretation
, evidence and emotion transcend time and culture and are built into the re
search goals of the discipline of criminology itself.