Objective To review the evidence on the effects of interventions to improve
housing on health.
Design Systematic review of experimental and non-experimental housing inter
vention studies that measured quantitative health outcomes.
Data sources Studies dating from 1887, in any language or format, identifie
d from clinical, social science, and grey literature databases, personal co
llections, expert consultation, and reference lists.
Main outcome measures Socioeconomic change and health, illness, and social
measures.
Results 18 completed primary intervention studies were identified. 11 studi
es were prospective, of which six had control groups. Three of the seven re
trospective studies used a control group. The interventions included rehous
ing, refurbishment, and energy efficiency measures. Many studies showed hea
lth gains after the intervention, but the small study populations and lack
of controlling for confounders limit the generalisability of these findings
.
Conclusions The lack of evidence linking housing and health may be attribut
able to pragmatic difficulties with housing studies as well as the politica
l climate in the United Kingdom. A holistic approach is needed that recogni
ses the multifactorial and complex nature of poor housing and deprivation.
Large scale studies that investigate the wider social context of housing in
terventions are required.