Artificial nutrition (enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition) is inc
reasingly being used in hospital and community settings to provide short- a
nd long-term nutritional support to a diverse range of patients with acute
and chronic conditions. Despite these methods of feeding being used either
in conjunction with diet, or as a sole source of nutrition, the issue of th
eir satiating ability has previously been largely overlooked. The consensus
that emerges from this review is that nutrients provided by enteral tube f
eeding or parenteral nutrition are not as effective as orally ingested nutr
ients at relieving appetite sensations or suppressing food intake. When art
ificial nutritional support is used as the sole source of nutrition, distre
ssing appetite sensations may occur, even if full nutrient requirements are
met by enteral tube or parenteral feeding. When used as a supplement to ad
libitum food intake, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition only par
tially suppress oral intake, and total energy intake is increased. The mech
anisms responsible for the poorer satiating ability of artificial feeding m
ethods, relative to food intake, are not clearly understood, but the bypass
ing of the upper gastrointestinal tract and associated cephalic phase respo
nse by these methods of nutrient delivery may be important. (C) 2001 Harcou
rt Publishers Ltd.