Background and objective: The use of heat and moisture exchanging filters (
HMEF) instead of conventional heated humidifiers is a cost-effective method
in intensive care medicine. It was the objective of this paper to investig
ate the evidence for HMEF from the viewpoint of prevention of pneumonia and
to investigate the appropriate changing intervals as well as filter materi
als.
Method: Randomised controlled trials published in recent years and focusing
on prevention of pneumonia as well as other prospective controlled studies
were reviewed systematically.
Results: The studies demonstrate neither a clear advantage nor disadvantage
of HMEF. No final statement is possible concerning changing intervals and
the most appropriate filter materials. However, the data give some evidence
for a possible extension of changing intervals to 72 hours without harm to
the patients and probably show very little influence of filter materials.
Conclusion: Because of the economic advantages of HMEF instead of an active
humidification, the use of filters - with the exception of contra indicati
ons for individual patients - should be preferred.