Body size distribution in predatory ladybird beetles reflects that of their prey

Citation
Afg. Dixon et Jl. Hemptinne, Body size distribution in predatory ladybird beetles reflects that of their prey, ECOLOGY, 82(7), 2001, pp. 1847-1856
Citations number
109
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00129658 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1847 - 1856
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(200107)82:7<1847:BSDIPL>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The size distribution of the species of a wide range of plants, herbivores, and carnivores are similar in form, i.e.. right skewed when size is plotte d logarithmically. In addition to differential extinction and speciation ra tes, it is argued that allometric constraints determine the efficiency with which resources are converted into offspring, which in turn determines the frequency of species of different body sizes. In looking for a general exp lanation for the size distribution shown by all organisms, theorists curren tly tend to favor explanations based on physiological rather than ecologica l constraints. Of the body size distributions of predatory ladybird beetles in the Palearctic. Nearctic, Ethiopian, and Australian regions, only that for the Nearctic is significantly right skewed. Even within the Palearctic, the form of the distribution differs among countries, with that for Japan significantly right skewed and that for Central Europe significantly left s kewed. An analysis of the prey of ladybirds indicates that increasing ladyb ird size is associated with increase in size and/or mobility of their prey. The smallest species feed on mites, and the largest on caterpillars and be etle larvae. In addition, the ratio of the numbers of species of aphidophag ous to coccidophagous ladybirds in the Nearctic and Palearctic regions refl ects the ratio of the numbers of species of aphids to coccids in these two regions. The relationships between egg and adult volumes for 61 species, an d egg and adult masses for 26 species both indicate that large species lay larger eggs than small species. In particular, the predators of large and/o r active prey lay larger eggs than the predators of small and/or slow movin g prey. The relevance of these findings to our understanding of the factors that have shaped body size frequency distributions is discussed. In the ca se of predatory ladybirds it is concluded that the shape of their body size distribution curves is determined by the nature and the relative abundance of their prey, that is., by ecological rather than physiological constrain ts.