Understanding how plant recovery from herbivory interacts with the resource
environment is necessary to predict under what resource conditions plants
are most affected by herbivory, and ultimately how herbivory impacts plant
population dynamics. It has been commonly assumed that plants are generally
best able to recover from herbivory when growing in high resource conditio
ns, an assumption which is supported by some models (e.g., the continuum of
responses model) but opposed by others (e.g., the growth rate model). The
validity and generality of any effects of resources (light, nutrients, and
water) on plant recovery from herbivory were tested with mixed-model, facto
rial meta-analyses using a log response ratio metric applied to plant growt
h and reproduction data from the ecological literature. In total. 81 record
s from 45 studies were included in the growth meta-analysis, and 24 records
from 14 studies in the reproduction meta-analysis. High resource levels an
d the absence of herbivory both strongly increased plant growth and reprodu
ction. There was no significant overall interaction between growth or repro
duction after herbivory and resource conditions, but the interaction terms
were significant for each plant functional group in the growth meta-analysi
s. Basal meristem monocots grew significantly more after herbivory in high
resources, while both dicot herbs and woody plants grew significantly more
after herbivory in low resources. A similar result was found in the 34.6% o
f growth records where exact- or overcompensation occurred. Overcompensatio
n was more likely in high resources for monocots and in low resources for d
icot herbs. The reproduction data set was too small to subdivide. These qua
litative differences between monocot and dicot herbs and woody plants expla
in many of the contradictory results in the literature and show that no sin
gle current model can account for the responses of all plants to herbivory.