The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: A meta-analysis

Citation
Cv. Hawkes et Jj. Sullivan, The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: A meta-analysis, ECOLOGY, 82(7), 2001, pp. 2045-2058
Citations number
108
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00129658 → ACNP
Volume
82
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2045 - 2058
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-9658(200107)82:7<2045:TIOHOP>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Understanding how plant recovery from herbivory interacts with the resource environment is necessary to predict under what resource conditions plants are most affected by herbivory, and ultimately how herbivory impacts plant population dynamics. It has been commonly assumed that plants are generally best able to recover from herbivory when growing in high resource conditio ns, an assumption which is supported by some models (e.g., the continuum of responses model) but opposed by others (e.g., the growth rate model). The validity and generality of any effects of resources (light, nutrients, and water) on plant recovery from herbivory were tested with mixed-model, facto rial meta-analyses using a log response ratio metric applied to plant growt h and reproduction data from the ecological literature. In total. 81 record s from 45 studies were included in the growth meta-analysis, and 24 records from 14 studies in the reproduction meta-analysis. High resource levels an d the absence of herbivory both strongly increased plant growth and reprodu ction. There was no significant overall interaction between growth or repro duction after herbivory and resource conditions, but the interaction terms were significant for each plant functional group in the growth meta-analysi s. Basal meristem monocots grew significantly more after herbivory in high resources, while both dicot herbs and woody plants grew significantly more after herbivory in low resources. A similar result was found in the 34.6% o f growth records where exact- or overcompensation occurred. Overcompensatio n was more likely in high resources for monocots and in low resources for d icot herbs. The reproduction data set was too small to subdivide. These qua litative differences between monocot and dicot herbs and woody plants expla in many of the contradictory results in the literature and show that no sin gle current model can account for the responses of all plants to herbivory.