Kk. Ngim et Dg. Crosby, Fate and kinetics of carfentrazone-ethyl herbicide in California, USA, flooded rice fields, ENV TOX CH, 20(3), 2001, pp. 485-490
Little is known of the environmental fate of the aryltriazolinone herbicide
carfentrazone-ethyl (compound I). Rice field applications of Shark(R) 400
commercial formulation to duplicate 5.7 m(2) rings (119 g a.i./ha) and 464
m(2) commercial basins (224 g a.i./ha) produced pseudo-first-order half-liv
es (t(1/2)) of 6.5 to 11.1 h in water and 37.9 to 174 h in sediment. The ra
pid dissipation from water was due to its hydrolysis to the chloropropionic
acid (compound II), which further degraded to its propionic, cinnamic, and
benzoic acids. Compound I degraded similarly in soil, but propionic and ci
nnamic acid levels were higher. Compound I was only weakly adsorbed, but la
teral movement of compound II through soil occurred. Laboratory hydrolysis
produced quantitative yields of compound II, t(1/2) values of 131 h at pH 7
and 3.36 h at pH 9, and slow dissipation at pH 5 (43% at 830 h). Ultraviol
et (UV) irradiation of compound I in pH 7 buffer gave dissipation rates sim
ilar to those in dark controls (t(1/2) 113 h vs 128 h), while compound II w
as comparatively stable to photolysis (t(1/2), 765 h) and also did not vola
tilize from water. Ester hydrolysis followed by off-site movement of the ac
id (compound II) account for the dissipation of compound I.